Information on Result #467656
There is no (53, 95, 171)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 40970 263353 149525 423971 919872 > 295
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (53, 96, 171)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |