Information on Result #467821

There is no (66, 100, 400)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 319111 378905 410108 431386 103096 > 2100

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 101, 400)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction