Information on Result #467943
There is no (42, 104, 88)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 438461 352402 925212 202459 814600 > 2104
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (42, 105, 88)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |