Information on Result #467979

There is no (45, 105, 98)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 228010 966923 435651 228212 654320 > 2105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 106, 98)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction