Information on Result #468563

There is no (45, 121, 89)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 773620 144933 980918 955014 638101 008120 > 2121

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 122, 89)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction