Information on Result #468605

There is no (52, 122, 111)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 918191 866311 223993 832803 871014 969738 > 2122

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 123, 111)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction