Information on Result #468851
There is no (56, 128, 122)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 418 195843 994517 565820 838127 220955 956658 > 2128
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (56, 129, 122)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |