Information on Result #468909

There is no (89, 129, 698)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 698 502114 269583 710617 796069 749706 697086 > 2129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 130, 698)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction