Information on Result #468973
There is no (51, 131, 102)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2765 665784 007270 112116 414793 269684 559768 > 2131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (51, 132, 102)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |