Information on Result #468974

There is no (53, 131, 109)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3406 902171 807792 243396 116676 740807 127096 > 2131

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 132, 109)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction