Information on Result #469062

There is no (59, 133, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 11591 990908 523476 569916 531721 205640 339392 > 2133

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 134, 129)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction