Information on Result #469082
There is no (99, 133, 1601)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 10894 176306 387477 892028 753741 759431 479352 > 2133
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (99, 134, 1601)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |