Information on Result #469186

There is no (50, 136, 98)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105842 513327 679436 602141 615543 299839 218240 > 2136

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (50, 137, 98)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction