Information on Result #469187

There is no (52, 136, 103)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 92889 612636 800647 136680 313413 360008 695464 > 2136

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 137, 103)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction