Information on Result #469235

There is no (59, 137, 126)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 209662 480036 660606 606123 779392 309462 743608 > 2137

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 138, 126)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction