Information on Result #469320

There is no (51, 139, 100)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 926266 050187 187027 105020 909096 186027 488080 > 2139

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 140, 100)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction