Information on Result #469437

There is no (105, 141, 1697)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 2 806911 241026 056843 676170 478955 724033 978440 > 2141

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (105, 142, 1697)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction