Information on Result #469483

There is no (106, 142, 1764)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 577304 085643 322424 523021 641640 786203 037214 > 2142

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (106, 143, 1764)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction