Information on Result #469994

There is no (85, 153, 260)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12397 557829 295153 354679 826933 426997 826905 892456 > 2153

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 154, 260)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction