Information on Result #470285

There is no (69, 159, 146)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 791435 169220 375948 697658 248942 521028 304756 022832 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 160, 146)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction