Information on Result #470291

There is no (81, 159, 208)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 835992 238376 411240 598676 195541 388528 788944 376610 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 160, 208)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction