Information on Result #470300

There is no (99, 159, 432)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 738867 218401 862590 959932 558553 908693 533727 618462 > 2159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 160, 432)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction