Information on Result #470342

There is no (80, 160, 199)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 587760 117730 532977 596747 652886 057946 202343 981864 > 2160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (80, 161, 199)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction