Information on Result #470353

There is no (102, 160, 494)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 538967 495922 622574 615921 375311 256072 553825 728082 > 2160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 161, 494)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction