Information on Result #470354
There is no (104, 160, 553)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 465411 174246 924498 795804 663917 529867 073868 682952 > 2160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (104, 161, 553)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |