Information on Result #470367

There is no (130, 160, 10420)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 462994 297344 266485 140088 081074 799411 566812 791428 > 2160

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (130, 161, 10420)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction