Information on Result #470367
There is no (130, 160, 10420)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 462994 297344 266485 140088 081074 799411 566812 791428 > 2160
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (130, 161, 10420)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |