Information on Result #470447

There is no (82, 162, 208)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 610679 273520 226065 990670 711568 638568 512392 702270 > 2162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 163, 208)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction