Information on Result #470470

There is no (128, 162, 5279)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 5 849475 336039 822801 073718 788882 710029 147019 049392 > 2162

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 163, 5279)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction