Information on Result #470489

There is no (61, 163, 118)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 127646 538126 521650 734243 301766 050765 517015 236854 > 2163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (61, 164, 118)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction