Information on Result #470550

There is no (80, 164, 192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 990097 305439 081249 137755 522680 366028 772618 603871 > 2164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (80, 165, 192)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction