Information on Result #470565

There is no (110, 164, 697)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 403892 052566 860158 181118 393280 430092 097157 169592 > 2164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (110, 165, 697)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction