Information on Result #470568
There is no (116, 164, 1083)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 433869 616726 454116 140676 171537 314682 841203 191047 > 2164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (116, 165, 1083)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |