Information on Result #470613

There is no (99, 165, 375)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 48 020103 183690 294065 547363 221241 625325 682298 190616 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 166, 375)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction