Information on Result #470629

There is no (131, 165, 5969)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 46 779741 699277 499551 985283 810701 137744 878226 074202 > 2165

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (131, 166, 5969)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction