Information on Result #470658
There is no (84, 166, 212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 96 566697 296403 102515 495902 319018 075759 398818 418620 > 2166
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 167, 212)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |