Information on Result #470674

There is no (116, 166, 979)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 94 459344 987303 276472 457737 069217 606493 483914 436896 > 2166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 167, 979)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction