Information on Result #470712
There is no (85, 167, 217)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 209 402862 643165 556087 815046 318382 999661 803737 419300 > 2167
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (85, 168, 217)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |