Information on Result #470719

There is no (99, 167, 360)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 193 141588 330951 779550 509326 380810 453999 830469 119963 > 2167

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (99, 168, 360)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction