Information on Result #470918

There is no (69, 171, 138)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3209 615918 919747 153868 709423 311372 119706 796812 607296 > 2171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 172, 138)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction