Information on Result #470983

There is no (90, 172, 240)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6139 236776 275362 492031 292910 070346 820102 356556 926913 > 2172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 173, 240)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction