Information on Result #471203

There is no (90, 176, 230)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 96725 411182 297479 291621 072627 322798 658699 588719 123248 > 2176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (90, 177, 230)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction