Information on Result #471286

There is no (145, 177, 14521)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 191669 459026 869133 426110 998681 547496 926815 526565 544977 > 2177

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 178, 14521)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction