Information on Result #471334

There is no (128, 178, 1380)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 389282 955588 887594 767788 661335 174198 024799 782066 170212 > 2178

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 179, 1380)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction