Information on Result #471475

There is no (69, 181, 134)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 680251 137824 850113 026151 399775 277692 906766 207681 142320 > 2181

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 182, 134)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction