Information on Result #471546

There is no (96, 182, 259)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 377923 685919 913964 103739 962908 889161 688070 781097 960000 > 2182

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 183, 259)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction