Information on Result #471602

There is no (93, 183, 235)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13 128337 809437 634279 340777 247736 101647 209628 051327 955728 > 2183

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (93, 184, 235)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction