Information on Result #471659
There is no (90, 184, 215)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 28 182811 155568 945117 979601 495979 607853 218785 556760 246360 > 2184
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (90, 185, 215)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |