Information on Result #471663

There is no (98, 184, 269)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24 657425 470763 762193 457759 359220 903158 156419 015792 210688 > 2184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 185, 269)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction