Information on Result #471694

There is no (160, 184, 218334)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 24 520943 547919 297297 494583 641043 491191 717918 144870 945127 > 2184

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 185, 218334)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction