Information on Result #471778

There is no (92, 186, 223)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 110 193371 294433 586738 089699 322328 070971 836113 829330 112620 > 2186

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 187, 223)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction